Login / Register
D
o
v
e
r
.uk.com
News
Forums
Dover Forum
General Discussion Forum
Politics Forum
Archive Updates
Channel Swimming Forum
Doverforum.com: Sea News
Channel Swimming
History Archive
Calendar
Channel Traffic
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.
All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
The post you are reporting:
PaulB - Good news indeed but lets strip out Labour's absurd spin.
Of the 1.1% growth just 0.1% was down to government spending. If anything this totally justifies George Osborne in tackling the UK's main problem, the huge deficit, mainly through public spending cuts.
Whatever Labour apologists claim the government cannot continue to spend £4 for every £3 of income. Failing or delaying dealing with this would see a financial crisis against which the credit crunch would pale into insignificance.
George Osborne is actually supported by the consensus of opinion among economists. The minority who disagree are led by David Blanchflower who I met in January. His case was exemplified by a single quote 'the price of 5% plus inflation per years for 5 years is a price worth paying'. He, unlike me, is not living in the real world advising elderly people manage their finances many of whom would see their living standard plummet 30% or more if he got his way. It is not a price worth paying, allowing inflation to reduce the debt burden while people get thrown to the dogs.
Labour's way of spend, spend, spend is simply the economics of the madhouse.
Report Post
Your Name
Reason
end link