Dover.uk.com
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.

All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
  • The post you are reporting:
     
    I have long suspected that the annual trip to the vet for cats and dogs to have booster vaccinations is a more about a money spinner for the vet than the welfare of the animal after reading that there was no evidence to suggest that immunity is lowered after they receive their inital jabs and that, like humans, the immunisations actually last several years if not a lifetime. This seems a logical conclusion.

    I haven't quite had the confidence to take this line with my dogs but after reading a new article yesterday which said there was new scientific evidence to suggest there is no need for annual vaccinations because of the retained immunity from the initial course it reminded me of my dilemma. I don't know what this new evidence is but I would love to get hold of it.

    What do other forumites think?

Report Post

 
end link