The post you are reporting:
He insulted no-one at all. You just have to see the context to see that Sid.
What I find appalling is how you in the PC brigade by this kind of action are effectively downgrading what is real and nasty rascism and, indeed are almost making it respectable to be rascist.
Look at it this way....
Harry refers to his little Paki friend in a friendly manner as he did.
The someone else is expressing real hatred for 'Pakis' and demanding the enforced repatriation of those they deem 'Paki', or perhaps directing insults and abuse towards them.
Having branded Harry a rascist, where do you go from there with the second example. There just is no comparison between the two. The second is an out and out nasty rascist and deserves to be condemned. By branding Harry you are condeming many people who would not dream of doing the latter.
If what Harry said means he is a rascist then that makes me one too, and all of us on this Forum with whom you are disagreeing, including PaulB, Dave, our Harry. Yet none of us would discriminate against someone on the basis of race, none of us would insult someone because of their race, none of us would advocate violence towards a member of a minority community.
What you are doing therefore is making rascism acceptable, resulting perhaps from many people a shrug of the shoulders, @if Harry is rascist, I am too so I might as well vote BNP...' Do you really want to make it respectable for people to vote BNP? Do you really want more and more people to accept that they are rascist just because the definition has been absurdly widened? Do you not see just how dangerous this pc attitude is to our society? How long before there is a reaction, perhaps this is whats happening in some parts of the country that are seeing BNP councillors elected.