• The post you are reporting:
   
  Reading that Barry, Cameron's is still the more considered approach. This guy is playing games with the boundaries of what is unconventional and what is wrong. When he starts to look at himself he talks about truth and never questions belief (which doesn't matter if you rely on mount Sinai), which would lead to ask what he actually thinks knowing is?
  
  I always find it funny this notion "why doesn't everyone adhere to this idea that we can do what we like" Amusingly paradoxical. Which always leads to me to ask why don't true believers in 'individualism' go it alone...why align to a group at all?
  
  It is quite easy to use this chaps justification to defend someone shouting some rather 'fun' abuse at a police officer or telling a school teacher to f' off. Afterall adhering to rules is just conforming, and not free speech. (both of these examples don't incite any hatred) "it's a lack of respect" you say, respect being a taught belief (or truth, who knows) that we conform to!
  
  Why don't people know what is 'wrong' anymore (see beelzebub thread), because they are acting as this chap would want, using their own rules and not shared ones!

Report Post

Your Name

Reason