• The post you are reporting:
   
  She had worked in the shop for two or three years. Only part time so not the end of the world, although she is very upset. One light of hope at the end of the tunnel is that she was hoping to get a job as housekeeper at the area hospital and had applied a long time ago. She finally received an invitation to an interview in December. This arrived during the trial!
  
  She is now hoping that they must have done a police check before inviting her for an interview and will not do another one showing that she is now deemed to be a master criminal with links to the Kray Brothers and Al Qaeda! She is presumably now stuffed for any other job that requires a police check or has a box on the application form asking if you have a criminal record.
  
  The journalist asked her if she would mind him taking a photo when they were outside the court. She asked him not to as she feared that she that might lose her job if her employers saw it, correctly as it transpires. He said that he had to take one anyway, whether she liked it or not, and that is what happened.
  
  Sadly her photo was printed but, needless to say, not a photo of the policeman who caused all the trouble in the first place and was responsible for the great army of patrol cars, dog handlers and helicopter which congregated. I wonder if he gets a kick out of this sort of thing, like the occasional fireman who starts fires for the thrill of taking part in fighting them.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason