• The post you are reporting:
   
  Yes Sid its a fact that none of the trio made a telling and decisive move for real victory...because although there are differences between them as BarryW pointed out there, there are also mass similiarities as ColetteB was suggesting. Never before have there been so many floating voters. Its a true phenomenon. Something like 27% of people are still undecided. Its like the butterfly..it can land on any branch without noticing a huge difference in terrain.
  
  The first week was a concensus love-in but all was judged on image and performance that time. More grit is needed as we go along, and thats what we got last night..to a degree. But I wonder does anybody do any real absorbtion of ideas and policies on a debate like this. It's all I think more about performance than anything else. If you sound right and look right then you must be right.
  This is what happened in previous years with the American version. If a guy sweats, or looks at his watch, then he is finished. No one cares or cared what policy he may have been spouting.
  
  As is clear from the interviews afterwards, every side thinks their man has won, and every side beleives it. You would need a neutral who had been living in a WWII air raid shelter to emerge for us to get a true assessment.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason