Dover.uk.com
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.

All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
  • The post you are reporting:
     
    Me and my big mouth....

    "There has been some fascinating discussions recently amongst historians about the
    extent of the 'Colour bar' that existed in the British Army at the time of Tull's
    promotion to the rank of Second Lieutenant:
    John Simkin, creator of www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk wrote recently that,
    According to several accounts on Walter Tull it has been claimed that despite
    military regulations forbidding "any negro or person of colour" being an officer,
    Tull received his commission in May, 1917.
    I have had an email from the British Army legal department pointing out: This
    was not the case. The only prohibition was against 'an alien' enjoying 'any
    office or place of trust' (Act of Settlement Sec. 3), although they could hold
    honorary rank in the British Army, whether or not accompanied by a formal
    commission. Aliens could enlist in the British Army, see s. 95 (2) of the
    Manual of Military Law of 1914:
    'any inhabitant of any British protectorate and any negro or person of colour,
    ALTHOUGH AN ALIEN [my stress], may voluntarily enlist in pursuance of this
    Part of this Act...' (i.e. the Army Act)
    But the point is that Tull was born in Folkestone of a father from Barbados and
    a mother from Kent, and was therefore not an alien but a British citizen, and
    as such perfectly entitled to hold a normal active commission. It makes a good
    story to say that the rules had to be broken to make him an officer, but it isn't
    true. It is quite enough of a tribute that he rose from 'ranker' to officer in 2
    years."

    It goes on...

    "Phil Vasili, the author of Colouring over the White Line: the History of Black
    Footballers in Britain responded,
    The argument that (the army) are inferring is that Black British recruits did not
    face any unique difficulties in enlisting, which is contradicted by numerous
    personal accounts of soldiers of colour from the First World War. It is also
    contradicted by records held at Kew which detail the debates that Black
    enlistment ignited among civil servants and politicians. It is further
    contradicted by fact: if Blacks were freely entitled to join the army, and had
    done so, why was Tull the first Black infantry officer; and why was there not
    another until Moody in the Second World War?
    The section of the Manual quoted is unclear because it implies 'Negroes' are
    aliens and goes on to say that an alien may not 'exercise any actual command
    or power'. This allowed the army to get around the fact of medical officers of
    colour. I am still ABSOLUTELY convinced they had a colour bar against Black
    infantry officers. The facts speak for themselves.
    Lastly, why wasn't Tull given his Military Cross? Because he didn't deserve it?
    Or because, as an alien, he shouldn't have been 'exercising any actual
    command or power'?
    Vasili went on to further state that
    Tull was appointed to the Special Reserve of Officers. This is what their
    regulations in the Short Guide to Obtaining a Commission in the Special
    Reserve of Officers, published by His Majesty's Stationary Office, 1912,
    stated:
    [to qualify for a commission] a candidate must be of pure European descent,
    and a British born or naturalised British subject.
    The Manual of Military Law (1914) authorised alien soldiers, including any
    negro or person of colour to hold honorary rank but they must not exercise
    any actual command or power.[i] This rule created a contradiction because
    the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act 1914 affirmed the status of all
    those born within the British Empire as natural born British subjects.[ii] The
    act gave all peoples of Empire equivalent legal status to those born within the
    UK. However, if there was ambiguity as to the ethnic criteria needed to
    become an officer, this was spelled out on page198 of the Manual, confirming
    the regulation contained in the Short Guide of 1912, governing the Special
    Reserve of Officers (to which Tull was appointed to a commission in 1917):
    Commissions in the Special Reserve of Officers are given to qualified
    candidates who are natural born or naturalised British subjects of pure
    European descent.[iii]
    [i] Manual of Military Law, 1914, p.471.
    [ii] Richard Smith in The Oxford Companion to Black British History, David
    Dabydeen, John Gilmore and Cecily Jones (eds) (Oxford University Press,
    2007) p.176
    [iii] The Manual (1914) defines the Special Reserve of Officers as a branch of
    the Reserve of Officers...designed to ensure that all units, services and
    departments of the regular forces shall be complete in officers on mobilization;
    to make good wastage which will occur in the regular forces in war, and to
    provide officers for special reserve units. p198. Immediately underneath is the
    paragraph which states all officers must be of pure European descent.
    The key phrase is pure European descent. There is no ambiguity here."

    This is the whole text from a pdf file from 'teachfind.com' I cannot see a way to discover the whole address so as to allow any here to get to it for themselves, except by going through a Google search for...

    British military regulations, military regulations forbidding "any negro or person of colour" being an officer

Report Post

 
end link