The post you are reporting:
well let me say a few words';
1; on the issue of the article, since i left active politics, and just before i stopped
bythe local papers. Ia did try to highlight these issues when active but
didnt get to far with it so done what i could sdo by stopping buying the paper
others followed that route. Others even in my party believed in contributinhg
to the paper and that was there right, I found myself even in disagreement
with john G on this one. but i fought my corner as sometimes even i lose.
why dso i say all that? well if i wanted(and i wouldnt) gto take someone on
such as gwyn i woiuldnt use that paper.
On the article iv not read it but recently spoke to Tony who roughly told
me of his thoughts.
I have to say such a delicate issue i wouldnt want to plaster all over the
local media, but hey, everyone to there own.
On Gwyn, The labour party(which i understand Tony has not been a
member for many years)is a very broad party, and iv disagreed with
gwyn on issues, but i chose to deal with them internally.
Gwyn is not lazy, he works hard for the constituents maybe not always
in the way i like , but then i resp;rect many factions of people elected him
labour/ex tory / and others and he was elected on that ticket and will be again
We all get frustrated when politicians dont do what we want, i could write an
article on that every week, of all political parties thsat iv been let down by.
So all in all I feel it sells papers, i suppose, and iv hjad disagreements with
the labour party, but i find its esasier to take these concerns direct to him some
you win some you lose.
I know evren in the chamber when Tony was leader we didnt always agree
in fact i recall an issue i raised, he left the chamber so it happens at all levels.
so to me if like the forum articles indicate Gwyn is happy to open up the files he cant have to much to hide.
Blimey thats a lot longer article than i was going to do.
hopefully this will all die down and life will go on.