Who runs the D.D.C.

• Guest 649

  • Registered: 12 Mar 2008
  • Posts: 14,118
  11 September 2008     20:315983
  #1       report
  Please read my letter in the Political page in the FORUM.Is it the Cllrs or the Officers.
  
  Vic Matchm
• howard mcsweeney1

  • Location: Dover
  • Registered: 12 Mar 2008
  • Posts: 62,352
  11 September 2008     20:445984
  #2       report
  you have surprised me victor.
  i had not realised that there were still officers up there.
• Guest 649

  • Registered: 12 Mar 2008
  • Posts: 14,118
  11 September 2008     21:035990
  #3       report
  They are still there just some of them think they are more than that, and the Cllrs are leting them get away with it, most of them are in planning and they must be stoped or we will lose all what is left of the good will with developers ,and this is not just hot air from me, I was on site last week with a very big developer who just might walk away from our district because of the officers of the planning dept, they are doing nothing for our town or District and must be put back into place, only one man can do that.
  Over to you Mr Walkins.
• Guest 645

  • Registered: 12 Mar 2008
  • Posts: 4,463
  11 September 2008     22:065995
  #4       report
  Vic
  please be more specific..just 'who' and 'what' are 'they' getting away with.
  Your post is not making any sense
  Marek
  I think therefore I am (not a Tory supporter)
• howard mcsweeney1

  • Location: Dover
  • Registered: 12 Mar 2008
  • Posts: 62,352
  11 September 2008     22:395997
  #5       report
  victor
  you refer to planning.
  
  does this encompass mobile phone masts on blocks of flats a few doors away from where you went to school?
  
  i have been rudely awakened by our local town councillor that has her finger on the pulse of local affairs.
  
  the notice of application has been posted around the back of the flats where the mast is due to be sighted.
  all clever stuff, none of us knew about it until our sheila sussed it out.
• Guest 675

  • Registered: 30 Jun 2008
  • Posts: 1,610
  11 September 2008     22:575999
  #6       report
  Its in this months planning applications Howard. The 'mast' is proposed as cabling running up to the gables and being painted in to match the brickwork, there is nothing in the plans projecting above the height of the building. Just thought you would like to know. The proposal does not yet have a planning application number.
  Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong.
  Richard Armour
• howard mcsweeney1

  • Location: Dover
  • Registered: 12 Mar 2008
  • Posts: 62,352
  11 September 2008     23:276001
  #7       report
  fair comment chris
  two questions.
  
  with all the bad press about these things(i do not know the scientific stuff), but the word radiation keeps being used, why is it in a densely populated area, with hundreds of kids close by?
  
  why do the owners of the property, hide the planning notice behind the property?
• Guest 649

  • Registered: 12 Mar 2008
  • Posts: 14,118
  12 September 2008     09:156013
  #8       report
  Part of my work in the week is puting the masts up some very high some not so high you are safe on the ground if you are working on the platform where they are and they are turn on then some of them must be turn off before you work on them.
  But take it from me you are safe. We have been puting them up for years and IT IS OK.
  
  vIC mATCHAM
• Guest 649

  • Registered: 12 Mar 2008
  • Posts: 14,118
  12 September 2008     09:186014
  #9       report
  I am about to go away so will do a posting on the planning when I get back, just read what I have put on the P/page.
  
  Vic Matcham