• The post you are reporting:
   
  It seems that the must use term of the moment is "anarchy". As the extent of the mendacity and potential harm becomes more and more apparent, so the threats of anarchy and unrest proliferate.
  
  Surely real believers in democracy would back a second vote given the changes in demographics and the discovery of real facts as opposed to fiction that the last 3 years has brought? I mean, come on, remember what the real believers in democracy said when it suited them....
  
  "Indeed, we could have two referendums. As it happens, it might make more sense to have the second referendum after the renegotiation is completed"
  
  "If a democracy cannot change its mind, it ceases to be a democracy".
  
  "In a 52-48 referendum, this would be unfinished business by a long way"
  
  And who were the purveyors of these wise words? Rees-Mogg, David Davies and Farage respectively. If this bunch of bloated, self-important hypocrites now feel it is fine to change their minds, then why can't the British public have the right to change theirs if they so wish?

Report Post

Your Name

Reason