howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
Guest 1881 likes this
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,920
I think your right Howard, more a case of Goldsmith being so unpopular people voted against him.
It appears the Lib Dems had a power base in the area which they built upon
The Lib Dems were badly damaged by going in with the tories and some unkept promises.
This will take time to correct.
It has to be added the Tories(in a strong Tory area) gave Goldsmith a clear run.
with the labour vote collapse.
Is it me or do others feel the Lib Dem leader has been missing for some time?
It was a good result for the Lib dems but its how this carries across the country.
howard mcsweeney1 likes this
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
Farron ha been working hard Keith but does not have the media presence of Clegg. 400 canvassers were working for the Lib Dems including many local Labour activists who wanted to see the back of the obnoxious Goldsmith, they were doing their final leafleting on polling day starting at 4 am.
Paul M- Registered: 1 Feb 2016
- Posts: 393
The Lib Dems against a silver spooned ex Tory with no proper Labour, Conservative or UKIP opposition. No real upset really.
Jan Higgins and howard mcsweeney1 like this
Guest 1881- Registered: 16 Oct 2016
- Posts: 1,071
Let's not forget, James Goldsmith, his father, started and bankrolled The Referendum Party (UKIP's previous badge) - famously standing against David Mellor in Putney. People have long memories. Couple that with Zac Goldsmith's Mayoral campaign that turned racist in the days before the Londoners went to the polls and it is little wonder that he is out on his ear.
Frankly, as he is a tax-dodging Tory (trust fund beneficiary) representing the tax payers, it is rather unpalatable that he was ever allowed to represent the people in the first place.
Paul M and howard mcsweeney1 like this
Just because you don't take an interest in politics doesn't mean that politics won't take an interest in you. PERICLES.
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,875
It would have been interesting to know what the result would have been if an official Tory representative had stood. I know they were worried about a split vote but surely headquarters knew how unpopular Goldsmith had become in the constituency.
Guest 1881 likes this
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
I have had a talk to Mr Goldsmith many years go when we was both in the new party they are a party from Scotland I did bring the leaders down to Dover not a bad party and a party which has a lot of cash behind them.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,920
the lib dems are far from returning and labour had the cheek to stand in this election then when the next election came expected lib dems greens not to stand in this new very watery pact
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
I wouldn't write them off nationally Keith, Tim Farron is actively encouraging "Remain" Labour voters to defect to the Lib Dems and of course many campaigned for them recently in Richmond.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,920
Howard politics on the national scene the tories are in for 25 years, it will take at least that time for labour to move on from they are probably by then corbyn will be gone and labourelectingnew leader, moving to middle England to get vote it all goes round in a circle
yes the lib dems will pick a few votes up here and there
the pact wont work between parties nationally labour proved that in Richmond.
so its a long road ahead
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
