I have always been an opponent of the state executing people (reports of execution by injection from the USA make gruesome reading with difficulty of finding veins and the executed taking far too long to expire) and also found the reports of the recent use of a 'suicide pod', leading to Florian Willet, president of the Last Resort, being in custody for over a month while prosecutors determine if he had ‘selfish’ motives amid ‘strangulation mark’ claims (did she 'go gentle into that good night' or was she 'raging'?), rather worrying.
Writing in the Spectator this week the blessed Charles Moore puts forward a modest proposal which I have copied below.
[I]My young friend Dr Cajetan Skowkronski has helped me resolve a question that has been worrying me.
Why do supporters of ‘assisted dying’ insist that the best method is a cocktail of pills (or intravenous injection)? Their prescription has an air of medical respectability, but this is not a medical process. The sole aim in assisting suicide is to achieve the quickest, least painful death.
In a Twitter thread of Swiftian brilliance, Dr Skowkronski has the answer: ‘At the height of the French Revolution,’ he writes, ‘when large volumes of Assisted Deaths were taking place for the sake of noble aims, a compassionate physician, Dr Guillotin, felt that many of the prevailing methods were cruel. [He] therefore proposed the use of an accurate and immediate method which spares the “patients” so many of the regrettable sufferings associated with other therapeutic options such as hanging, shooting, axing, burning or dismemberment.’ After ‘extensive trials’ in France, this ‘was adopted in many progressive countries’.
Dr S feels that ‘As a 21st-century physician motivated by the same compassion… I see that prevailing “best practice” in jurisdictions where euthanasia is legal [is] inhumane, slow, and carries unacceptable complication rates’. He therefore urges that advocates of assisted dying be trained in ‘operating portable, modern guillotines to give their patients the very best care with instant effect’.
Obviously, ‘Guillotine stigma is a hurdle we must overcome…But think about the stigma we have already overcome by reframing Doctors Killing Patients as an act of compassion which we now call Assisted Dying.
Let’s execute change, together.’
Charles Moore[/I]
FWIW, an interesting article here
https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/10/30/philip-murray-looking-down-the-slippery-slope-can-assisted-suicide-be-restricted-to-the-terminally-ill/"Shall we go, you and I, while we can? Through the transitive nightfall of diamonds"