Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
what a week in parliment,all the new boys got there jobs.no sooner said than done you get boy william [hauge] dispatched off to the good old usa to man eater hillary c.then he is sent into the lions den in brussels.no sooner said and done dc goes to sarkozy/mertle and upsets them,can it get any worse umm yes g osbourne with his emergency budget.
.red top papers are calling the coalition, condems, there words not mine [daily mirror]to be precise.
Guest 658- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 660
Brian maybe you would like to type the post in English.
beer the food of the gods
Guest 672- Registered: 3 Jun 2008
- Posts: 2,119
Elomoum gooley de messer wesser Guz.
grass grows by the inches but dies by the feet.
C'mon Guzzler, Brian has a point. The coalition is already in tatters and very soon we will have a Labour government again. And why not? We all just love being taxed to the hilt, spending money we've borrowed that we can't afford to pay back. Me and millions of voters really wanted to have our lives wrecked by socialist buffoons who don't understand the concept of fiscal restraint. I pine for the days when I was governed by a party that lied in its manifesto to get my vote, but only banned fox-hunting and raped my pension fund.
It's not Brian's fault that so many bitter and twisted party faithfuls long to have their lives ruined and their grandchildrens futures destroyed by overwhelming debt repayments, all caused in the great campaign to deliver exactly what to the masses?
Guzzler, I ask you, how could you be so insensitive?
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
tom old chap couldnt get it any clearer than that.
ian gooleys to you to
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
maybe we should ingore brians typing errors and read the point he is making?
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Cant make it out but the Daily Mirror was mentioned, scraping the barrel quoting that rag probably explains why its unintelligble.
"Rag" gives it more credibility than it deserves!!!
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
barryw,no scraping of the barrel,just an observation of the various deeds by the great and good of the condems.in short willian h went to see hillary c,theres a joke in there somewhere.george o went to lions den in brussels and david c went on a european tour france/germany and upset both partys.the daily mirror has coined the phrase condems as a point of referance to the goverment,i hope this makes it clear for you as it seems you are feeling a bit sleepy this morning.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Serious newspapers have a very different viewpoint. The Mirror cannot be taken seriously.
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
barry,every body has a differant view point.the newspapers have own point to make,thats why goverment pr people at downing street buy all of them to get a genral picture of whats being said and whats not.
Guest 693- Registered: 12 Nov 2009
- Posts: 1,266
The Mirror can't be taken any more seriously than The Sun; one's a left-wing pile of poo, one's a right-wing pile of poo. Both manipulate their readership to suit their own politics, neither merit the price.
True friends stab you in the front.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
I would not soil myself with either comic Andy...
Guest 674- Registered: 25 Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,391
I think the point BRIAN was making was the diffrent viewpoints being put out by two ministers or even 3 at the same visit.
It confused the press/public as to who was give the correct govt line
AND shame realy because I think willy hague comes across well, the 2 with him were a disaster
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
kieth,early days for the condems.a few early stumbles begining to show still early days.saying that the colalition dosent seem to be quite joined up at the moment,just waiting to hear osbourne emergency budget,i am expecting some damage but it depends on how much or how little he does to the econamy.the question is will there be a double dip before or after the budget.with fste yoyoing and being at its lowist leavel for a couple of months.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Keith - actually was it really contradictory? Split away political spin and newspaper interpretation the get at what was really said...
1/ Liam is right that we would not be there in Afghanistan if it was not in our own national security interest.
2/ Andrew Mitchell is right that to 'win' we have to build a better life for the Afghanis to wed them away from the Taliban in a hearts and minds operation.
3/ William is right, we would be wrong to pull out too quickly.
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
i see by todays press that the dasterdly duo the brothers grim have started there dirty deeds,robbing the young,the uni dewellers and the old and infirmed.what more damage can these brothers grim do.another question arises here with people becoming unemployed where exactuly will the brothers grim get taxs from,will they start taxing benifits,pensions etc.and futher more where on earth can these young bright sparks get educated to a high standerd or do we have to inport enginers etc from countrys outside the uk to fill the vacent spaces.wellcome to pigs.uk.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
So brian - what is your alternative?
You know the economy cannot continue on its present course and the deficit has to be tackled. Remember even Darling admitted there would be 'savage cuts'....
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
barryw,to answer your question foriegn aid worth more than 6 billion.
Guest 693- Registered: 12 Nov 2009
- Posts: 1,266
Sadly, Brian, that wouldn't be anywhere near enough; did you see the graph on the front page of The Independent this morning? If you didn't, Bob Frost has put it on here on another thread, and - as Howard said - it's really frightening.
I don't particularly share your concerns over University students tbh, although I do believe that OAPs and the elderly are priorities that must be looked after better than they have been, but - be honest - these cuts are the legacy of an economy that has been so badly mismanaged over the past decade. In other words, by the Labour Government; and, whoever was taking on the reins in Downing Street would have faced the same problems, so I'm afraid your insults about the Condems are hardly fair, especially as the cuts are the direct result of Labour's gross incompetence.
True friends stab you in the front.
