Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#601
One British Pound equals 1.16 euro............
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#602
paraty then,travelers to europe will be pleased at 1.05 euros per pound.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#603
Roger
no different to yourself when you get into your anti labour mode
please we are not stupid
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
#604
Keith Sansum1 wrote:maybe the pundits are right
we not going to get out of this until 2018 at the earliest
We'll never get out of this Keith, this, whatever this is, is where we are and where we're staying.
You lot on here spend all your time arguing about party politics, its what is ruining the country. Until we elect a party that balances the books we're on a downhill slide, yet neither the useless Tories or the disingenuous Reds have the balls to face up to it.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#605
Thank you for your imput David
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
#606
My pleasure.
Its time to face reality Keith, we are drowning in debt, unemployment is high and more people are arriving here. 2018, 2058, its irrelevant until we make drastic changes, theres none on offer from the 2 main parties, they're both useless.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#607
maybe 3 parties david?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
#608
Well you could say 10 in that case, because there is not a political party with the will or ambition to solve our problems.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#609
just making the point david
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#610
Cameron could not negotiate his way out of a paper bag.....
David Cameron has been put on notice that no other EU leader is likely to support his campaign to rewrite the terms of British
membership of the union and then put the outcome to a referendum.
As Britain faces a fresh EU battle over a proposal to cap bankers' bonuses, Herman Van Rompuy, the president of the
European council, attacked the way the prime minister was waging his campaign for a "new settlement" in Britain's 40-year
membership of the EU.
The president said he presumed leaders of other EU countries "neither particularly like ... nor particularly fear" Cameron's plans
to demand the repatriation of powers during a future revision of the Lisbon treaty.
"How do you convince a room full of people, when you keep your hand on the door handle? How to encourage a friend to
change, if your eyes are searching for your coat?" he asked at a Policy Network conference in London.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#611
PS.............Cameron does not have his headline ``Veto``..............this time........what a plonker......
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#612
You can ignore rhetoric from Herman van Rumpy-pumpy, it means nothing.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#613
going alone is one thing
leaving yourself isolated quite another
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#614
Courtesy The Independent.............
Friday morning House of Commons Charlie introduces private members bill....UK would cease to
recognise EU Human Rights.
Every speaker was Tory none of which support the EUcourt.......prolonged one sised rant turned into
an irrelevant Philosophical battle between Rory Stewart and the `strange` Jacob Rees-Mog over the
concept of ``absolute`` human rights ......yawn.....for the rest you have to go to `Hansard`......
.........was it worth it ?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#615
Human rights may have some problems
but there is a lot of good in the human rights act ti
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
#616
But there's no responsibilities and without them, you can't have rights - or consequences. There needs to be a serious and meaningful amendment or the HR will just continue to be a supporter and crutch for those who do wrong and not those who are wronged.
Roger
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#617
but a lot of good in the human rights also
so try to amend yes but throw it all away no
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#618
a human has rights,weather right or wrong we humans have rights.its a euroscptic thing [in this case the conserveative people] who have objections to it.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#619
fairly true brian
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#620
The main problem I see with Human Rights is that a criminal's rights seem more important than the law abiding public when it comes to interpretation by the legal profession.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------