Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#81
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Weird Granny Slater
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 7 Jun 2017
- Posts: 3,095
#82
Al1967 wrote: 
utter bollocks once again
I like your pith, Al. Reminds me of Sam Beckett: 'Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.'
Guest 2547 likes this
'Pass the cow dung, my dropsy's killing me' - Heraclitus
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#83
if at first you don't succeed give up and make a cup of tea.
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
#84
So with no evidence that what Robinson is saying isn’t true .and with all the grooming gangs and attacks happening to back up his words, I think we can safely say that Robinson has hit the nail on the head with his findings in his book.
And with no evidence that Robinson is a racist, his reasons for exposing Islam can only be for public safety.
So the question is why is the conservative party and the labour party not dealing with the dangers hidden in the book of Islam?? Especially as them dangers mostly target females homosexuals and none believers??
Guest 1713 likes this
Weird Granny Slater- Location: Dover
- Registered: 7 Jun 2017
- Posts: 3,095
#85
KB, what exactly are Robinson's 'findings', by that I mean those things that have not previously been 'found' by anyone who has read, studied and written about the Koran?
'Pass the cow dung, my dropsy's killing me' - Heraclitus
SWWood- Location: Dover
- Registered: 30 May 2012
- Posts: 261
#86
Keith Bibby wrote:And with no evidence that Robinson is a racist, his reasons for exposing Islam can only be for public safety.
Public safety? How can a man who has repeatedly tried to cause mis-trials in serious criminal cases be motivated by public safety? He has dumped all over the real victims of these crimes, and is simply using them in order to raise his public profile and stir up hatred.
Brian Dixon, Guest 1881 and Jan Higgins like this
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#87
Surely the only people who feel it is ok to praise this publicity seeking extreme right wing man are simply racists even if they do not realise it.
Islam is no worse than our own national religion Christianity, which inflicted its own kind of indoctrination and cruelty, the problem only arises when certain followers go to the extreme and cause all the trouble.
SWWood, Brian Dixon and Guest 1997 like this
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
#88
Jan Higgins wrote:Surely the only people who feel it is ok to praise this publicity seeking extreme right wing man are simply racists even if they do not realise it.
Islam is no worse than our own national religion Christianity, which inflicted its own kind of indoctrination and cruelty, the problem only arises when certain followers go to the extreme and cause all the trouble.
explain right wing ??
is it right wing to the fight against rape gangs ?
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#89
no,thats the police job. not a bunch of thugs.
Guest 1881 and howard mcsweeney1 like this
Paul M- Registered: 1 Feb 2016
- Posts: 393
#90
He pleaded Guilty, so I'm not sure what more has to be said?
Guest 2547- Registered: 1 Apr 2018
- Posts: 2,158
#91
Rape is an abhorrent, vile crime whoever perpetrates it. I know from a close friend of mine in Dover. If you find this unconvincing just ask the victims of John Warboys. Or don't they count as much?
Paul M- Registered: 1 Feb 2016
- Posts: 393
#92
Yes and when the perpetrator(s) are caught and evidence obtained they then go to Court where they will be fairly dealt with. We don't need anyone to undermine that process. He's just a egotistical loudmouth and is rightly locked up. He admitted his crime and got his just deserts.
SWWood, howard mcsweeney1, Keith Sansum1 and
1 more like this
SWWood, howard mcsweeney1, Keith Sansum1 and Jan Higgins like this
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
#93
Paul M wrote:Yes and when the perpetrator(s) are caught and evidence obtained they then go to Court where they will be fairly dealt with. We don't need anyone to undermine that process. He's just a egotistical loudmouth and is rightly locked up. He admitted his crime and got his just deserts.
the gang from Ramsgate that raped the young girl were out on bail???
this was the leadup to the protest and filming outside Canterbury crown court. despite evidence that got them a 20-year sentence. she was apparently raped for over 4 hours by multiple men.
if this lot where on remand, no filming would have followed, they wouldn't have been outside court smoking fags .this was the reason for the first so-called contempt of court.
the second case the trial had finished, they were back for sentencing .
why are we having restrictions placed on these proceedings?
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#94
I agree that bail should be refused to anyone accused of such serious charges but that is no excuse for the appalling behaviour here.
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/canterbury/news/far-right-activist-spared-jail-126340/SWWood- Location: Dover
- Registered: 30 May 2012
- Posts: 261
#95
Keith Bibby wrote:
the second case the trial had finished, they were back for sentencing .
why are we having restrictions placed on these proceedings?
There can be a number of reasons why reporting restrictions (not D Notices as you tried to claim!) are required, protecting the witnesses being high on the list. In this case, (the second trial at Leeds), restrictions were placed because there was another trial related to the same event, which had not reached its conclusion. Reporting on one trial could prejudice the jury in the other.
In any case, if Robinson was so concerned about the victim in the Ramsgate case, why act in a way which caused the judge to feel it necessary to make special arrangements for the Jury to leave the court building? His actions would no doubt give the defence grounds to seek a mis-trial, potentially putting the victim through the stress of another trial.
This blog explains the events pretty clearly, though I doubt Yaxley-Lennon's supporters will read it, as it doesn't quite fit their narrative!
Weird Granny Slater- Location: Dover
- Registered: 7 Jun 2017
- Posts: 3,095
#96
It's all in the The Book of Robinson, but only if you read it backwards standing on your head, blindfold, with one arm tied behind your back, omitting every other word, and rearranging said omitted words according to a secret formula contained in the copyright details, holding the results up to a mirror, removing every 7th letter, bringing them to the boil in a pan of salted water, simmering for 20 minutes, straining the mixture through a sieve, cooling it, rolling it into a square, baking it for 30 minutes in a pre-heated oven at gas 7, fixing it to a pole then waving it about a bit. It worked for me.
Guest 1997 and Brian Dixon like this
'Pass the cow dung, my dropsy's killing me' - Heraclitus
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
#97
Weird Granny Slater wrote:It's all in the The Book of Robinson, but only if you read it backwards standing on your head, blindfold, with one arm tied behind your back, omitting every other word, and rearranging said omitted words according to a secret formula contained in the copyright details, holding the results up to a mirror, removing every 7th letter, bringing them to the boil in a pan of salted water, simmering for 20 minutes, straining the mixture through a sieve, cooling it, rolling it into a square, baking it for 30 minutes in a pre-heated oven at gas 7, fixing it to a pole then waving it about a bit. It worked for me.
now your just being silly, Mr weird
Weird Granny Slater- Location: Dover
- Registered: 7 Jun 2017
- Posts: 3,095
#98
Keith Bibby wrote:now your just being silly, Mr weird
Not so, KB. The silly one is Robinson, who claims that, by re-arranging the contents of a 1300 year-old book written in Arabic, he has made a discovery worthy of anyone's attention. But not so silly, perhaps, as the ones taken in by it.
Guest 2547 likes this
'Pass the cow dung, my dropsy's killing me' - Heraclitus
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
#99
Weird Granny Slater wrote:Not so, KB. The silly one is Robinson, who claims that, by re-arranging the contents of a 1300 year-old book written in Arabic, he has made a discovery worthy of anyone's attention. But not so silly, perhaps, as the ones taken in by it.
even you can't defend, countries that follow this book, and implement its laws aren't distasteful?
with a rising Islamic population in the UK ? how long do you think we have before, they start calling for some form of Islamic law, to be implemented into UK law??
I can just see you, Mr Weird, voting for the stoning of adulterers wives at Labour party conference?
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#100
Keith Bibby wrote:even you can't defend, countries that follow this book, and implement its laws aren't distasteful.
with a rising Islamic population in the UK ? how long do you think we have before, they start calling for some form of Islamic law, to be implemented into UK law??
Can I just see you, Mr Weird, voting for the stoning of adulterers wives at Labour party conference?
That red haddock is doing the rounds on the far right sites despite the Muslim population of the UK being 4.4% at the 2011 census. Getting back to reporting restrictions nobody knew about the Jonathan King trial until it ended. Common sense really as it meant that alleged victims could give evidence without knowing what the others had said. All the afore mentioned gave similar descriptions of the flat and his seduction techniques which made it easy for the jury.
