Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
#21
You may be right, but I can never gave up just keep trying+I like doing it I will be taking votes from someone they will be some blues and some reds it might just stop the blues geting in and it might be the other way round for the reds,we all know from what happen last time I did get over 600votes this time will be more and if there is not much beween the big boys well anything could happen ,but I will be having my say at all the meetings just like last time,and if you look back in the old papers at that time it was me geting the headlines as the under dog/
Guest 674- Registered: 25 Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,391
#22
All on viewpoints im not alone as has been posted on here its costly which will be a barrier.
I have no idea what labours view is on this, but i would suspect its same as mine.
Time will tell on this one over next few months
Sid Pollitt
#23
So... the Tories would use this to select local candidates from local people and not parachute in someone from far away like Mayfair or Park Lane.
The trick would be to have a rubbish person as the secondary candidate so that the primary candidate would be an obvious and compelling choice [I note that no-one has said that the losing candidate in Totnes was any good].
And... Tory central office could then pre-select the candidates.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
#24
You have a vivid imagination Sid. You must have spent hours dreaming that one up. Dont work though as it simply and not surprisingly does not fit the facts.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#25
i hope that you are reading this victor.
sid points out that the blues have been known to parachute candidates in from outside.
the sight of you plummetting to earth could be a good vote winner.
give it some thought.
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
#26
Well said Howard but I am not a blue U.K.I.P is the party I am in ,but if they do not wish me to stand for them it will be back on my own again,wait and see is the name of the game at this time. VicM
Guest 645- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,463
#27
Its not your legs that need examining Vic but much higher up your body just above the neck....you need your head examining! I thought you previously stated that you wanted to spend more time with your lovely wife and dog.
Are you really standing for Dover sakes or your own?.
Marek
I think therefore I am (not a Tory supporter)
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
#28
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
#29
Marek is living in Jersey in the Channel Islands Vic, it's very unlikely that he'll be in Dover over the week-end.
Roger
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
#30
I have no more say about it then,I might just go there one day
Guest 645- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,463
#31
Vic
I have seen you many times at St Pauls and the White Horse plus the Boxing Day Dips but I have that ugly face that once seen soon forgotten. I shall be back in Dover soon to sort out some business so unlike Keef and Co I shall take you for a beer rather than a coffee.
Marek
I think therefore I am (not a Tory supporter)
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#32
victor does not imbibe of the devils brew marek.
Guest 674- Registered: 25 Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,391
#33
marek
i have offered vic out(for a beer
) b4 today
Guest 645- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,463
#34
Thanks Howard and Keef for pointing me in the right direction regarding Vics alcoholic tendencies....he can always have a one of those frothy coffee type things....urgh
Marek
I think therefore I am (not a Tory supporter)
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
#35
Let me know when you're here Marek, I'll come for a beer.
Roger
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
#36
Thank you for that I will take you up on it but no beer,having been down that road will not do it again,so it is a no to the fire water but yes lets all meet up and a chat over a cuper,thank you.
Vic M
Sid Pollitt
10 August 2009
18:1026969#37
Going back to my point about the second placed candidate, I see that the Lib Dems have said they had been organising to back the candidate they believed was the weakest, and therefore, the easiest to beat in the general election. Maybe No2 was the stronger candidate and this has been lost in the hype.
Here in the Dover constitiuency I hear that there was a campaign to select a Tory candidate that was not only local but knew where Sholden was, it failed.
