Guest 943- Registered: 15 May 2013
- Posts: 449
Lesley,Good question.
Howard,post#77..Is there a underlying observation you wish to share with me and the group ?
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,915
good point lesley
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Roger, in fact part of what you write in post 79 is what I advocate in post 78.
The difference is, though, not only bricklayers', nurses' and doctors' jobs, but also factory jobs and fruit/vegetable harvesting should be done by Brits.
There is no reason why a Brit can't work in a warehouse or a greenhouse or in an orchard.
The idea that every Brit should only be a doctor or a nurse or a bank manager is fundamentally wrong and is one reason why our economy went down the drain.
Every minimum wage worker from Eastern Europe has full entitlement to all benefits, including child benefits, and full access to all our social services, and that is millions of people.
The State has borrowed tens of billions to pay for all this, including the resulting benefits for unemployed Brits, and has taxed the economy to pay for it, and our Public Debt is now unsustainable because of it.
It also means that a few million Brits, including 1 million youth, are unemployed, many of them on job-seekers benefits of £50 odd a week to a maximum of £73 a week if over 25.
Give me one reason why an unemployed Brit of 20 can't pick fruit and veg on a farm or in a greenhouse or work in a warehouse.
Adding to this fundamental logic, we also need our factories back. We don't need China and India to produce our clothes and shoes.
Finally, why is warehouse/factory employment and harvesting any less skilled than other forms of employment?
All these forms of employment are skilled work, and it is wrong to make British people believe otherwise.
Doctors, nurses, bricklayers, warehouse and factory workers. farmhands and basket weavers are ALL EQUAL and deserve equal respect.
They are all skilled people in their own sphere of work, and our Country should not deny the British People to participate in the economy.
By suggesting that only doctors and bank managers are skilled people, and that only these jobs should be coveted by our own brethren, New Labour has flung our economy down the drain.
It's up to us now to throw this spell down the drain and stand up for FREEDOM and REDEEM our Country.
This cannot be done under the New Labour policies of throwing millions of Brits out of work by importing millions of cheap labour workers from abroad, or by closing down all our factories and importing almost everything at rubbish-wage prices .
The coming General Election campaign will be the Sane Economy to replace the pound-shop economy, the factory and farm to replace the job-centre, the British bricklayer laying British-made bricks and the British carer caring for people in need.
Rule Britannia!
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,915
same old alexander,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
The jobs were on offer to UK residents many took up the call
sadly many UK also didnt, preferring the easier life on benefits
its a reality of life
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
a bit racist of you keith, surely you are aware that many of the jobs were not advertised here but farmed out(no pun intended) to overseas agencies that could then pay the minimum wage that applied in their own country.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,915
Racist????????????
Im aware of many UK residents working around these areas
the rest iv explained above
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Keith, similar terms were used to describe Jews.
There is a trace of racism in your post.
True social values should be advocated in Britain and in all European countries too, at national level.
Racially orientated statements do not help anyone.
Countries that need help are those that do not have the same soil-fertility as we have, such as in the Sahara, where it often rains too little and people are short of crops.
I would agree to helping these countries through agricultural, irrigation and forestation projects.
Fertile and industrious Eastern Europe could prosper, they should not need Britain and North-Western Europe to pay hundreds of millions of pounds a day into their economies.
They should not need to send millions of workers to the British Isles and Western Europe.
They have enough fertile territory to feed themselves and to feed half the world!
The European Union is a product of the Loony Left and its attempts to humiliate national dignity in many countries.
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
Ukip membership going up so fast we have to bring in more officials to cope with the extra work
David very welcome in this post
good man
Guest 1033- Registered: 23 Aug 2013
- Posts: 509
Alexander, pots, kettles and black. Your post #78 is bordering on racism, not that I care, but don't knock other posters for what you are doing yourself.
Guest 1694- Registered: 24 Feb 2016
- Posts: 1,087
Oh Dear, Alexander has done it now
the rubicon has been crossed and the thread is over "Keith, similar terms were used to describe Jews" however obliquely the holocaust and Hitler's Germany have been referenced
Guest 977- Registered: 27 Jun 2013
- Posts: 1,031
I'm left wondering when "the Sahara" became a country and joined the EU - or have I missed something?
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
extention to blackpool pleasure beach ray..
Guest 1694- Registered: 24 Feb 2016
- Posts: 1,087
Ray Newsam1 wrote:I'm left wondering when "the Sahara" became a country and joined the EU - or have I missed something?
Must have something to do with global warming Ray - I'd heard that the Sahara was growing.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
i think i have cracked the riddle now - ray refers to the sahara not being part of the e.u. and neil mentions about the sahara spreading.
With me so far?
soon the sahara will stretch as far up as ceuta which is officially part of spain which means we could be inundated with bedouin tribespersons and the odd berber to take all the fruit picking jobs.
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
no howard,kieths Albanian friends will be doing that.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,915
cant say i have any brian
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
the other keith keith.
i think there is an echo in here.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,915
what what
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
The Sahara is a desert in Africa and several countries include parts of this desert.
There are also other deserts, such as in Egypt, and semi-deserts in the world that extend over vast areas.
Howard rightly points out that the Sahara is spreading.
These countries that have vast desert and semi-desert areas do have agricultural problems that European countries and Britain do not have.
It doesn't make sense to pay £50 million a day into fertile Eastern Europe.
Eastern Europe could supply food to half the world.
Perhaps one reason why so many people are trying to migrate from Africa to Europe and Britain is because their countries cannot cope with the problems deriving from climatic conditions and lack of irrigation.
That's where Britain can help, even if we didn't always receive a financial return for the efforts, it would be money worth spending, as it would help hundreds of millions of people to improve their situation to sustain themselves.
Barrie, my post 78 is void of racism.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Welcome back, Keith Bibby
