Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
we will wait and see kieth.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,845
Certainly will Brian
But like you have said in the past you not a labour follower anyway so doesn't really matter .
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Neil Moors- Registered: 3 Feb 2016
- Posts: 1,295
We now have the Lord Chancellor (Raab), in charge of the courts, saying that "Police do not look into crime retrospectively". How low can this lot take things? They know they had a party, they are just sticking two fingers up at everyone else.
ray hutstone- Registered: 1 Apr 2018
- Posts: 2,158
Neil - this from the Met last year. The day before the Xmas party at Number 10. The stench refuses to go away.
Neil Moors- Registered: 3 Feb 2016
- Posts: 1,295
My guess is that Downing Street is now desperately searching for a scapegoat - and any plan that gets the PM personally off the hook, regardless of how many others go under the bus as a result. The more Ministers are interviewed, the deeper the hole becomes.
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,790
I think we all know that our MPs of all parties tend to think they are more important than the rest of us.
I also think there are far more important things for everyone to worry about than that bunch of numpties in Parliament possibly bending the sometimes confusing rules a year ago.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Captain Haddock
- Location: Marlinspike Hall
- Registered: 8 Oct 2012
- Posts: 7,892
Neil Moors wrote:We now have the Lord Chancellor (Raab), in charge of the courts, saying that "Police do not look into crime retrospectively".
He didn't think this through did he?
ALL crime happened in the past and is therefore investigated retrospectively?
We're not in Minority Report territory yet!
What he actually meant was that most sane people don't give a toss.
A bit like Dominic Cummings eye-test drive.
"Shall we go, you and I, while we can? Through the transitive nightfall of diamonds"
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,845
Neil
Your continued attack on Boris does you know justice , I think it's fair to say very few people agree with Boris and his party over last year .
I think everyone who wants to know , now knows .
But what I'm still waiting for Is not all the anti conservative tripe , but a move towards , well under labour we will no longer be expelling members who disagree with us , and get back to the broad church we once indicated we were .
And not stop individual members standing in selections.
And then most importantly a long list of why labour will have a new refreshing programme that will save us all
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
ray hutstone- Registered: 1 Apr 2018
- Posts: 2,158
Jan Higgins wrote:I think we all know that our MPs of all parties tend to think they are more important than the rest of us.
I also think there are far more important things for everyone to worry about than that bunch of numpties in Parliament possibly bending the sometimes confusing rules a year ago.
Why is it right that the Met should fine the little people yet ignore brazen double standards from those who set the rules? There are lots of important things happening all around us. I'm saddened that you don't think pulling the wool over the populace's eyes is amongst them. Each to their own, I suppose.
Button
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 22 Jul 2016
- Posts: 3,009
May the force be with you:
(Not my real name.)
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,790
ray hutstone wrote:Why is it right that the Met should fine the little people yet ignore brazen double standards from those who set the rules? There are lots of important things happening all around us. I'm saddened that you don't think pulling the wool over the populace's eyes is amongst them. Each to their own, I suppose.
Stuart/Ray please grow up you certainly seem to delight in what my mother would have called nit picking, not that I really care it gives you yet another chance to complain about the Government.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Button- Location: Dover
- Registered: 22 Jul 2016
- Posts: 3,009
The real issue from the events of a year ago is why the Downing Street copper was left outside to keep the cat company and watch out for marauding cyclists instead of being invited in for some alcohol-free punch and a mince pie!
Jan Higgins likes this
(Not my real name.)
ray hutstone- Registered: 1 Apr 2018
- Posts: 2,158
Jan Higgins wrote:Stuart/Ray please grow up you certainly seem to delight in what my mother would have called nit picking, not that I really care it gives you yet another chance to complain about the Government.
I'm happier to be called Stuart, Jan. I was never comfortable lurking behind my anagram pseudonym. I can't understand why you think think (or your mother might have done) that this is nit-picking. Governments, in my view, shoudn't lie to their voters or practice such blatant double standards when so may people have died. I complain about alot of things on here when I feel the complaint is justified. You're always welcome to counter my arguments, if you can.
And, Christine, your humour does bring a smile sometimes even if it dodges the point in question.
Captain Haddock- Location: Marlinspike Hall
- Registered: 8 Oct 2012
- Posts: 7,892
WTF? Keef is really Christine?
Jan Higgins, Button and John Buckley like this
"Shall we go, you and I, while we can? Through the transitive nightfall of diamonds"
ray hutstone- Registered: 1 Apr 2018
- Posts: 2,158
Captain Haddock wrote:WTF? Keef is really Christine?
Er, no. Christine is Christine.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,845
I have never had to hide
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Captain Haddock- Location: Marlinspike Hall
- Registered: 8 Oct 2012
- Posts: 7,892
Keith Sansum1 wrote:I have never had to hide
And certainly not in Zara's changing rooms!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10275757/CHARLOTTE-GRIFFITHS-facing-dilemma.html"Shall we go, you and I, while we can? Through the transitive nightfall of diamonds"
Captain Haddock- Location: Marlinspike Hall
- Registered: 8 Oct 2012
- Posts: 7,892
Button wrote:May the force be with you:
Is Hobo Cop counting himself as one of the extra 20,000 police officers? I think we should be told.
"Shall we go, you and I, while we can? Through the transitive nightfall of diamonds"
Button- Location: Dover
- Registered: 22 Jul 2016
- Posts: 3,009
Captain Haddock wrote:Is Hobo Cop counting himself as one of the extra 20,000 police officers? I think we should be told.
He was just visiting, I believe. It's a thing with organisations being visited that they always give the politician a silly hat to wear, on the grounds that they're too thick to realise. Charlie E, for example, was rarely seen in public without sporting his helmet.
ray hutstone likes this
(Not my real name.)
ray hutstone- Registered: 1 Apr 2018
- Posts: 2,158
Charlie E, for example, was rarely seen in public without sporting his helmet.
(Not my real name.)
ray hutstone likes this(Not my real name.)
